Decision Cycles
You are here
Decision Cycles
Final Draft: Decision Cycles 7+8
The Power to the Profession Task Force is excited to share with you the final draft of Decision Cycle 7+8. This document, which includes the results of public comment and engagement with the field, outlines recommendations related to a supportive infrastructure and shared accountability for the early childhood education profession.
Join us! Read the draft,听also available in Spanish听and share with your colleagues.听
Educadores hispanohablantes:
Tome un momento para explorar听nuestra p谩gina en espa帽ol sobre Power to the Profession (Revalorizar la profesi贸n).
Power to the Profession Modules: Summary Statements, Study Guides and Additional Resources
The Urgent Need to Advance as a Unified Profession to Benefit Children and Families
The resources in this section are to help you reflect on some of the foundational questions of Power to the Profession, such as: What is this initiative about? Why are we approaching it in this way? What problems are we trying to solve?
Review
, Jacqueline Jones, PhD, President/CEO, The Foundation for Child Development
, Laura Bornfreund and Stacie Goffin
听by Stacie G. Goffin - Dec. 1, 2017
A Letter to Every Adult Who Was Once A Child and Turned Out Fine听by Rhian Evans Allvin - May 10, 2017
Reflect
Summary Statements and Study Guide
Declaraciones resumidas y gu铆a de estudio
听
Power to the Profession Implementation and Timeline
Review
- Webinar hosted by Rhian Evans Allvin, CEO, 51吃瓜网Early Childhood Educators: Advancing the Profession 鈥� Executive Summary from 51吃瓜网
; by Stacie G. Goffin
; by Samantha Marshall - Aug. 26, 2017
Reflect
Summary Statements and Study GuideDeclaraciones resumidas y gu铆a de estudio
Decision Cycle 1 - Professional Identity and Boundary
The initial cycle addressed the name, identity, scope, and responsibilities of what has been embraced as the early childhood education profession. With multiple rounds of responses and engagement, the content outlined in Decision Cycle 1 is based on the central concept that early childhood educators care for and promote the learning, development and well-being of children birth through age eight in all early childhood settings while meeting the qualifications of the profession and having mastery of its specialized knowledge, skills, and competencies.
Review
听by Teri Talan - March 8, 2017
听by Linda Jacobson - Dec. 8, 2017
A Profession-Led Dialogue: A Letter from the Chief Executive Officer to 51吃瓜网 Members听by Rhian Evans Allvin - Feb. 22, 2017
Power to the Profession Decision Cycle 1 Task Force documents
Consensus Draft for Decision Cycle 1 approved by the P2P Task Force
The Early Childhood Profession within the Early Childhood Field听(graphic)
La Profesi贸n de la educaci贸n de la primera infancia dentro del campo de la primera infancia
Reflect
Summary Statements and Study Guide
Declaraciones resumidas y gu铆a de estudio
Decision Cycle 2 - General Competencies
The second cycle addressed the question of how to use our existing resources and arrive at a set of agreed-upon standards and competencies that encompass required knowledge and skills for all individuals within the early childhood education profession, as defined in Decision Cycle 1.
Update: Draft #2 of the leveling of听Professional Standards and Competencies for Early Childhood Educators has been released. This draft focuses on the levels of competency for early childhood educators by designation (ECE I, ECE II, ECE III). The workgroup is taking public comment until November 15, 2019.
Review
Competency documents to be considered in the review of early childhood educator competencies:
- Council for Exceptional Children - , (Early Intervention/Early Childhood Special Education)
- (Evidence based practices necessary for high quality inclusive programs for all children birth to age 8)
- (for center-based: Infant/Toddler and Preschool; Family Child Care; and Home Visitor)
- (for teachers of students ages 3 to 8)
- (for educators supporting children birth to age 3)
Power to the Profession Decision Cycle 2 Task Force document
Consensus Draft for Decision Cycle 2 approved by the P2P Task Force
Reflect
Summary Statements and Study Guide
Declaraciones resumidas y gu铆a de estudio
听
Decision Cycles 3, 4, and 5 - Specializations, Competency Attainment Source, Qualifications and Pathways
Given the deeply interconnected nature of Decision Cycles 3, 4, and 5, they are being addressed as a whole, rather than on a sequential basis. We cannot detangle professional preparation, professional designations, scopes of practice, and specializations.
This draft was open for a period of public comment for 13 weeks in the spring of 2018. The comments and feedback from the field were taken into consideration and given careful deliberation and used to inform Decision Cycles 3, 4, 5 + 6 described below.
Task Force Statement on feedback from Decision Cycles 3, 4, and 5 draft 1.
"We are deeply grateful for the thoughtful responses we received on the first draft of Decision Cycles 3, 4, and 5 related to preparation, specialization and career pathways for the profession." Read the full statement.
Review
Working Draft 1 for Decision Cycles 3, 4, and 5
Los ciclos de decisi贸n 3, 4 y 5
Decision Cycles 3, 4, and 5 one pager
Reflect
Summary Statements and Study Guide
Declaraciones resumidas y gu铆a de estudio
Decision Cycle 345+6 - Preparation, Pathways, and Compensation
Based on feedback and input from the early childhood field, the recommendations in this cluster of decision cycles represent key components of the unifying framework for the early childhood education profession. The first three recommendations are the second draft of Decision Cycle 345, which focuses on differentiating pathways and preparation. The fourth recommendation comprises Decision Cycle 6, which focuses on compensation.
Review
Decision Cycles 345+6听(Agreed upon by the Task Force)
Ciclos de Decision 345+6听(Decision Cycles 345+6)
Decision Cycles 345+6 Executive Summary
Resumen Ejecutivo El Marco Unificado de la Profesi贸n de la Educaci贸n de la Primera Infancia: Primera Edici贸n听(Executive Summary)
Decision Cycles 345+6 Overview slide presentation
听was presented on December 18, 2018, and previews the content of the Decision Cycle 345+6 Discussion Draft 2.
听
Reflect
Overview of Content Revisions and Comparison Chart
Resumen de las Revisiones del Contenido听(Summary of Content Revisions)
听(Note: this document is continuously evolving and we will continue to add more questions as they come up.)
Respond
Share thoughts directly by emailing [email protected]
Decision Cycles 7+8 - Resources, Infrastructure, and Accountability
The next set of recommendations from the Power to the Profession Task Force, known as Decision Cycle 7+8, addresses the resources, infrastructure, and accountability structures needed across states and systems to support a prepared, diverse, well-compensated early childhood education profession.
Review
Decision Cycles 7+8
Ciclos de Decision 7+8
Reflect
- revised and updated
- recoreded August 15, 2019
Respond
Share your thoughts directly by emailing [email protected]
听
Concept of Decision Cycles
All the components of the framework for a unified profession are interconnected and dependent on one another. In order to manage this complexity, we are structuring the initiative into a series of coordinated, iterative and strategic decision cycles. These cycles are designed to be predictable and intentionally sequenced to build on one another in order to lead to a unified framework.
The goal of using cycles to approach this conversation is to be able to focus on one aspect of the unified framework at a time without losing its connection to the whole. The outcome of each cycle will be a defining document for each element of the unified framework. However, each document has the possibility to be revisited at a later cycle as new insights and connections are revealed.
听
Anatomy of Decision Cycle
-
Deliberations with Task Force meeting
Pre-meeting Information gathering including review and synthesis of research
Each Task Force meeting will end with a working draft statement on the topic of each cycle -
Review and feedback from the field
Draft statement available for review听the Task Force meets
Draft statement first sent to Stakeholders
Comment period on working draft -
Analyze feedback from the field and implementation analysis
Task Force deliberates on changes, makes recommendations for working draft 2 -
Review and feedback from the field
Draft statement available听after first public comment period closes
Comment period on working draft 2 open
Collect and analyze reaction to working draft 2 -
Task Force approves final draft